Tavares, Nogueira & Associados (real case — data altered under NDA) is a law firm in Braga, with 12 lawyers and 4 administrative staff. The practice focuses on commercial, labour and civil litigation. The founding partners are brilliant jurists, but they had a problem that no legal knowledge could solve: every day, the team lost hours on administrative tasks that had nothing to do with practising law. This case shows how we recovered 15 hours per week — time the lawyers reinvested in what they actually do best.
The Problem: Excellent Lawyers, Poor Time Management
In law firms, time is literally money. Most bill by the hour, and every hour not recorded or poorly recorded is lost revenue. At Tavares, Nogueira & Associados, the problem was threefold: inefficient time recording, deadlines managed in a makeshift fashion, and fragmented client communication.
Timesheets were filled in manually at the end of each day — when they were filled in at all. The lawyers worked on multiple cases simultaneously, and the retrospective recording of time was, at best, a rough estimate. An internal study revealed that, on average, the lawyers recorded only 72% of the time effectively worked. In a team of 12 lawyers with an average hourly rate of €95, the 28% of unrecorded time represented an estimated loss of €14,000 to €18,000 per month.
Court and administrative deadlines were managed with a combination of personal diaries, post-its and shared Excel spreadsheets. There was no centralised system to alert for approaching deadlines. In the 12 months prior to our intervention, the firm had missed two court deadlines — one of them with significant financial consequences for the client and reputational consequences for the firm.
Client communication was equally chaotic. Clients called or emailed asking about the status of their case, and the responsible lawyer spent 10 to 15 minutes searching for scattered information to provide an answer. Multiplied by 8 to 10 such calls daily, that was 2 hours per day spent on updates that could have been automatic.
The Numbers Before the Intervention
• Hours recorded vs. worked: 72% (28% of potential revenue lost).
• Monthly revenue lost in unrecorded time: €14,000–€18,000.
• Deadlines missed in the past 12 months: 2.
• Weekly hours on administrative tasks (per lawyer): 6.5 hours.
• Average response time to clients about case status: 4 to 8 hours.
• Client satisfaction (NPS): 32.
The Solution: Three Integrated Systems
System 1: Intelligent Automated Timesheet
We implemented a time recording system that worked in the background. When a lawyer opened a document related to a case, the system automatically started tracking time. When they switched to another case or took a break, the system recorded it and started a new count.
At the end of the day, instead of filling in a spreadsheet from memory, the lawyer received an automatic summary: "Silva vs. Costa case: 2h15; Almeida Lda case: 1h30; Meeting with client Ferreira: 45min." They just needed to validate with a click — or adjust if necessary.
Phone calls were also recorded automatically. The system integrated with the office telephone and logged the duration of each call, associating it with the corresponding case based on the client's number.
Within 30 days, the time recording rate rose from 72% to 94%. The monthly revenue recovered was approximately €12,000 — time that had previously been worked but never billed.
System 2: Deadline Management with Automated Alerts
We created a centralised deadline management system with multiple layers of alerts. Each deadline had four notifications: at 30 days (planning), at 7 days (preparation), at 2 days (urgency) and on the day itself (final warning).
Alerts were sent to the responsible lawyer, the supervising partner and the administrative assistant. If a deadline passed without the lawyer confirming that the action had been completed, the system automatically escalated to the managing partner.
Beyond court deadlines, the system managed internal deadlines: dates for document review, dates for sending opinions, dates for client meetings. Each case had a visual timeline showing, at a glance, all past and future milestones.
In the 12 months following implementation, the firm did not miss a single deadline. The team's confidence in the system grew rapidly — the lawyers went from "yet another tool to learn" to "I cannot imagine working without this" in under two months.
Does your firm waste time on tasks that are not legal work?
We implement automation systems designed for law firms — timesheets, deadlines and client portals. Free diagnostic.
View automation solutions →System 3: Client Portal
The client portal was the piece that completed the transformation. Each client had access to a private area where they could check the updated status of their case, view shared documents, access the communication history and even check invoicing.
The portal updated automatically whenever the lawyer recorded an activity on the case. When a document was finalised, when a hearing was scheduled, when an opinion was issued — everything appeared on the client's timeline without the lawyer having to do anything additional.
The impact on follow-up phone calls was immediate. In the first month, calls of the type "what is the status of my case?" fell by 65%. By the third month, the reduction was 82%. Clients accessed the portal, found the information they needed and only called when they had substantive questions — the type of call that lawyers actually want to receive.
The Results: Before vs. After
• Hours recorded vs. worked: from 72% to 94% (+22 percentage points).
• Monthly revenue recovered: +€12,000 in time now billed.
• Deadlines missed: from 2 per year to 0.
• Administrative hours per lawyer/week: from 6.5 to 3.2 (−15 hours across the team).
• Client response time: from 4–8 hours to real time (portal).
• Follow-up calls: 82% reduction.
• NPS (client satisfaction): from 32 to 67.
Lessons for Any Law Firm
1. Unrecorded time is invisible revenue. Most firms assume that unrecorded time is "inevitable". It is not. With an automatic recording system, the gap between time worked and time billed can be reduced to under 10%.
2. Deadlines cannot depend on human memory. A missed deadline can destroy a client's trust and, in extreme cases, have disciplinary consequences. An automated alert system costs a fraction of what an error costs.
3. Transparency builds trust. Clients do not call to ask about the status of their case because they are difficult — they call because they have no visibility. A client portal solves this problem and, at the same time, positions the firm as modern and professional.
4. Lawyers are not administrators. Every hour a lawyer spends filling in timesheets, searching for emails or updating clients is an hour not spent practising law. Automation does not replace the lawyer — it frees them.
5. Adoption matters more than technology. The best system in the world is useless if nobody uses it. The key was implementing tools that integrated into the lawyers' natural workflow, rather than demanding radical changes in behaviour.
Conclusion
Tavares, Nogueira & Associados did not change its team, did not hire more people and did not alter its market strategy. It only changed the way it managed time, deadlines and client communication. The result: 15 hours per week recovered, €12,000 per month in recaptured revenue, zero missed deadlines and significantly more satisfied clients.
If your firm recognises these problems, the first step is to measure: how much time does the team spend on administrative tasks? What is the gap between time worked and time recorded? How many deadlines came close to being missed in the past year? The answers to these questions will reveal the path to a transformation that can begin in weeks, not months.
