Atelier Pórtico (real case — data altered under NDA) is an architecture firm in Porto with 14 employees — 8 architects, 3 engineers, 2 administrative staff and the founding partner. With an average of 22 simultaneous projects in different phases, operational management relied on a mix of Excel spreadsheets, emails, shared Dropbox folders and a whiteboard in the meeting room. The founding partner confessed that he spent more time managing processes than practising architecture: "I lose 15 hours a week chasing timesheets, preparing proposals and finding out where each project stands."
The Diagnosis: Organised Chaos Blocking Growth
The audit we conducted exposed structural problems that are endemic in Portuguese architecture firms. Projects were managed in silos — each architect had their own way of organising files, and finding the latest version of a drawing could take 20 minutes. Dropbox folders contained dozens of files with names like "Plan_v3_final_FINAL2.dwg", without any real version control.
Timesheets were filled in on a shared Excel spreadsheet that frequently became locked when two employees tried to edit it simultaneously. Architects admitted they filled in their hours at the end of the week "from memory", which meant the data were, at best, approximations. Since the firm charged by the hour on several projects, this imprecision translated directly into lost revenue — we estimated between 8% and 12% of hours went unbilled due to lack of recording.
Commercial proposals were another critical pain point. Each proposal was prepared manually in Word, with copy-paste from previous projects, value adjustments and formatting. The process took between 3 and 5 hours per proposal. With a conversion rate of 30%, the firm needed to prepare, on average, 10 proposals to close 3 projects — an investment of 30 to 50 hours per month in purely administrative work.
Metrics Before the Transformation
• Weekly hours of the partner on administrative management: 15 hours
• Average time to prepare a proposal: 4 hours
• Unbilled hours due to timesheet imprecision: 8–12%
• Time to locate a project file: 10–20 minutes
• Proposals sent per month: 10
• Proposal conversion rate: 30%
• Delays in project deliveries: 45% of projects
The Solution: Three Pillars of Transformation
1. Centralised Project Management Platform
We implemented a project management platform designed specifically for the firm's needs. Each project has its own panel with clearly defined phases (preliminary study, preliminary design, execution design, construction supervision), deadlines, assignees and associated documents. The version control system ensures there is always a single current version of each file — previous versions remain accessible in the history, but there is never confusion about which is the most recent.
The general dashboard shows the workload of each team member, projects at risk of delay and the forecast vs. actual profitability of each project. The founding partner went from "I don't know where we are" to "I see everything on one screen" — without needing to interrupt anyone for updates.
We also integrated a document management system with automatically structured folders. When a new project is created, the system automatically generates the standard folder structure (drawings, written documents, correspondence, photographs, etc.), eliminates variability and ensures any team member can find any file in seconds.
2. Digital Timesheets with Simplified Recording
We replaced the Excel spreadsheet with a time-tracking system integrated into the management platform. Employees record time directly on the project they are working on, with a timer that can be started and stopped with a single click. At the end of the day, they receive an automatic reminder to validate the hours recorded. If an employee does not record hours for two days, the system sends an alert to the supervisor.
The impact on billing was immediate. With accurate, real-time records, unbilled hours dropped from 8–12% to less than 2%. In a firm billing an average of €35,000 per month, this improvement represented between €2,100 and €3,500 in recovered revenue per month.
Does your firm waste hours on manual timesheets and proposals in Word?
Automate project management, proposals and time tracking with a solution designed for architecture and engineering firms.
Discover automation solutions →3. Automated Commercial Proposals and Digital Portfolio
We created an automatic proposal generation system that radically transformed the commercial process. The partner fills in a structured form with the client's details, project type, area, complexity and requested services. The system automatically calculates the fees (based on a parameterisable table by project type), generates the document with a professional layout, includes relevant reference projects from the portfolio for the type of work and creates a PDF ready to send — all in under 15 minutes.
The digital portfolio is another transformative component. Instead of sending heavy PDFs by email, the firm now has an interactive online portfolio where each project includes high-quality photographs, floor plans, technical description and client testimonial. The portfolio link is automatically included in each proposal, allowing the potential client to explore previous work in an elegant and professional manner.
The system also records which portfolio projects each potential client viewed and for how long, providing the partner with valuable information for commercial follow-up.
The Implementation: 8 Weeks from Paper to Digital
Weeks 1–2: Data migration and configuration. We migrated all active projects to the new platform, created folder structures and configured access permissions. Archived projects were indexed and made searchable.
Weeks 3–4: Training and gradual adoption. We held individual training sessions with each team member. Digital timesheets went live immediately, with the old system running in parallel for one week for validation.
Weeks 5–6: Proposal system. We configured the proposal templates, imported the fee schedule and integrated the digital portfolio. The partner prepared three real proposals with the new system to test and refine.
Weeks 7–8: Optimisation and automations. We configured automatic alerts, profitability reports per project and integration with the invoicing software.
The Results: Measurable Impact on All Fronts
After four months of operation, the results were measured and compared against the previous benchmarks.
• Weekly hours of the partner on administrative management: from 15 to 4 hours (−73%)
• Average time to prepare a proposal: from 4 hours to 15 minutes (−94%)
• Unbilled hours: from 8–12% to less than 2%
• Time to locate a project file: from 10–20 minutes to less than 30 seconds
• Proposals sent per month: from 10 to 18 (more time available)
• Proposal conversion rate: from 30% to 42% (more professional proposals)
• Delays in project deliveries: from 45% to 12%
• Monthly revenue recovered (unbilled hours): +€2,800 on average
The most significant impact, however, was qualitative. The founding partner went back to dedicating time to design and business development. With 11 weekly hours recovered, he launched a new service line — interior design consultancy — which in the first quarter generated €18,000 in additional revenue. The team, freed from organisational chaos, reported greater satisfaction and less stress, and the firm did not lose a single employee in the six months following implementation.
Conclusion
Architecture and engineering firms face a paradox: they are highly qualified professionals who spend a disproportionate share of their time on administrative tasks that require no special qualification. Managing projects in Excel, filling in timesheets from memory and preparing proposals in Word are legacies of a pre-digital era that cost real money — in unbilled hours, in proposals lost through lack of professionalism and in projects delayed through lack of visibility.
The digital transformation of an architecture firm does not require multi-million budgets or months of implementation. It requires a structured approach, tools suited to the context and the willingness to replace old habits with smarter processes. The return — financial and human — amply justifies the investment.
